Thursday, June 02, 2005

On Deep Throat - UPDATED

Of the loads of verbiage that's come out in the last 24 hours on "Deep Throat", I found David Frum's (click title) to be the most concise and compelling. Excerpt:

1) There were very few if any crimes committed under Richard Nixon that FDR, Truman, JFK, and LBJ did not also commit, from snooping on political opponents' IRS records (something that Nixon was prevented from doing but that FDR regularly did), to violating campaign laws (an LBJ speciality)...I argued in my history of the 1970s, How We Got Here that Nixon's misconduct has to be seen as an exaggerated form of the misconduct of his predecessors, and not as some unique deviation of his own.

2) One reason that Watergate memories so galvanize the press is that liberal journalists can now understand that Watergate represented the very zenith of their cultural influence. For one shining, shimmering moment, they decided who were cultural heroes and who were villains.

They could transmute a bitter old segregationist like Sam Ervin into a defender of the Constitution for standing against Nixon --and utterly destroy an innocent like former Commerce Secretary Maurice Stans for standing too close to him. There was no Fox News, no Rush Limbaugh, and barely even a Wall Street Journal editorial page as Robert Bartley would build it and we now know it...

3) Finally, today might be a good day to recall that the techniques of cover-up used by Nixon were borrowed later by Bill Clinton. True, Nixon was covering up a grave political offense, and Clinton was covering up a tawdry affair. The Nixon administration was a somber and sometimes sinister tragedy; the Clinton administration an absurd farce.


As for me, I am hardly a Watergate scholar and was a bit young to understand what was going on at the time. My 'first' President, alas, was Jimmy Carter. Just two thoughts here:

1. I think Mark Felt leaked to Woodward and Bernstein because he was piqued that Nixon didn't give him the nod as FBI Director after Hoover's death but instead anointed administration insider L. Patrick Gray. However, his 30 year silence is to his credit as he could have come out much earlier and been a hero to many and definitely a media darling.

2. Even though Woodward and Bernstein didn't break the Watergate story, (see Edward Jay Epstein's excellent history here), I do think they played a significant part in fanning the flames which eventually forced Richard Nixon's resignation. The greatest tragedy about Nixon's fall from grace?

It sealed the fate of South Vietnam. (and that of two million Cambodians)

*************

UPDATE:

Peggy Noonan says it much more eloquently than I can.

Even if Mr. Felt had mixed motives, even if he did not choose the most courageous path in attempting to spread what he thought was the truth, his actions might be judged by their fruits. The Washington Post said yesterday that Mr. Felt's information allowed them to continue their probe. That probe brought down a president. Ben Stein is angry but not incorrect: What Mr. Felt helped produce was a weakened president who was a serious president at a serious time. Nixon's ruin led to a cascade of catastrophic events--the crude and humiliating abandonment of Vietnam and the Vietnamese, the rise of a monster named Pol Pot, and millions--millions--killed in his genocide. America lost confidence; the Soviet Union gained brazenness. What a terrible time. Is it terrible when an American president lies and surrounds himself by dirty tricksters? Yes, it is. How about the butchering of children in the South China Sea. Is that worse? Yes. Infinitely, unforgettably and forever. [emphasis added]
...
Maybe the big lesson on Felt and Watergate is as simple as the law of unintended consequences. You do something and things happen and you don't mean them to, and if you could take it back you would, but it's too late. The repercussions have already repercussed. Mark Felt cannot have intended to encourage such epic destruction. He must have thought he was doing the right thing, protecting his agency and maybe getting some forgivable glee out of making Nixon look bad. But oh the implications. Literally: the horror.


I wonder, knowing what he knows today, would Mark Felt have done the same thing all over again if he had the opportunity.

No comments: